High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/7/2021disposed off

Yogesh Dewangan v. Smt. Preeti Dewangan

2021-01-14Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 7 of 2021 • Yogesh Dewangan S/o Shri Pawan Dewangan Aged About 32 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o Parshuramnagar, Near Malsai Talab, Professor Colony, Tahsil And District Raipur OfÏce Address Sale Tax Behind Rajbhawan Civil Line, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Smt. Preeti Dewangan W/o Yogesh Dewangan Aged About 29 Years Wasu Beauti Parlor, Near Gupta General Store, Parshuramnagar, Near Malsai Talab, Professor Colony, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Kanishaka Dewangan D/o Yogesh Dewangan Aged About 9 Years Through Mother And Natural Guardian Namely Smt. Preeti Dewangan, Wasu Beauti Parlor, Near Gupta General Store, Parshuramnagar, Near Malsai Talab, Professor Colony, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Vedansh Dewangan S/o Yogesh Dewangan Aged About 6 Years Through Mother And Natural Guardian Namely Smt. Preeti Dewangan, Wasu Beauti Parlor, Near Gupta General Store, Parshuramnagar, Near Malsai Talab, Professor Colony, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Applicant :

None.

For Respondent/State:

None.

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 14.01.2021

1. This is an ofÏcer reference.

2. The matter is listed for orders on PUD dated 15.12.2020 sent by First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur (C.G.) requesting for extension of further time for disposal of the

case.

3. On 17.09.2019 in the case of the petitioner passed in CRR No. 924/2018 this Court had issued a direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. By the PUD under consideration, the Court below has said that the trial has not been concluded within the prescribed time limit on account of Lockdown and prayed for further time for concluding the trial.

4. As the request made by the concerned Court appears to be genuine and, therefore, six months further time is granted from the next date of hearing of the case to ensure disposal of the case. The concerned Judge is directed to make all the endeavour for disposal of the case within time.

5. Registry is directed to send the copy of this order to the concerned Court and also to the concerned District Judge. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge vijay sahu