Surendra Singh Parihar And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.6089 of 2010

1. Surendra Singh Parihar, S/o I. S. Parihar, aged about 46 years, working as Shiksha KarmiI, Government Higher Secondary School, Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. Chhanu Lal Sinha, S/o Late Narottam Sinha, aged about 44 years, working as Shiksha KarmiII, High School, Poperchedi, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. Laxman Lal Sahu, S/o Shri Chabi Ram Sahu, aged about 37 years, working as Shiksha Karmi-II, Govt. High Secondary School, Bodhkera, District Raipur (C.G.)

4. Gajanand Sahu, S/o Shri Hira Lal Sahu, aged about 43 years, working as Shiksha Karmi-I, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Rasaila, District Raipur (C.G.)

5. Bhishma Singh Kumarra, S/o Shri Tailor Singh, aged about 43 years, working as Shiksha KarmiII, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Rasaila, District Raipur (C.G.)

6. Uttam Kumar Kurre, S/o Shri Jhanglu Ram Kurre, aged about 37 years, working as Shiksha KarmiII, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kodkera, District Raipur (C.G.)

7. Smt. Lata Prasad, D/o Shri Kailash Prasad, working as Shiksha Karmi-II, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Rasaila, District Raipur (C.G.)

8. Lalit Kumar Sharma, S/o Gajju Ram Sharma, aged about 36 years, working as Shiksha Karmi-II, High School, Dagori, District Raipur (C.G.)

9. Lokeshwar Verge, S/o Chaturbhuj Verge, aged about 35 years, working as Shiksha Karmi-II, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Rasaila, Raipur (C.G.) 10.

Smt. Archana Verma, W/o M. Verma, aged about 45 years, working as Shiksha Karmi-I,

Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bagh, Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Ministry of School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)

2. District Education Officer, Office of District Education Officer, Baloda Bazaar, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Raipur (C.G.)

4. Director, Department of Public Instruction, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate For Respondent-State Mr. Sunil Otwani, Addl. AG Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 23/06/2021 1.

Mr. Sunil Otwani, learned Additional Advocate General for the State, would submit that the recruitment in question has already been completed, as such no cause of action survives for adjudication.

2.

The statement made by Mr. Otwani is placed on record.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost (s). However, the liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioners to revive the petition, if any cause of action still survives.

Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Nirala