Ramhin Bai v. Panchuram And ANR.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR SA No. 457 of 2012 • Ramhin Bai W/o Gokul Sahu Aged About 60 Years Fagundaah, Tah. Gurur, Distt. Durg C.G.

---- Appellant

Versus

1. PanchuramS/o Aged About 34 Years Johar Singh, Tah. Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari C.G.

2. State Of Chhttisgarh Thru- The Collector, Bemetara, Distt. Bemetara C.G. Earlier It Was Collector, Durg, Distt. Durg C.G., ---- Respondents For Appellant : Shri Amit Kumar Sahu, Advocate For State : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 17.11.2021

1. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that during the pendency of the second appeal, the appellant and respondent No. 1 have settled their dispute, therefore, he does not want to continue with the proceedings under the second appeal.

2. Considering the submission, the prayer is allowed.

3. The Second Appeal is dismissed as settlement has arrived at between the parties.

Sd- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge kishore