← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/395/2020disposed off

Mrs. Aruna Netam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP(S) No.395 of 2020 • Mrs. Aruna Netam W/o Mr. Santosh Kumar Netam Aged About 46 Years Post- Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Government Higher Secondary School, Saina, Block Baderajpur, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Public Instructions Indrawati Bhawan, Block Iii, Ist Floor, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Kanker, District U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent/ State :

Mr. Avinash Singh, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 17.01.2020 1.

Limited grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that his date of appointment in the Gradation List, published in the year 2018, wrongly shows the date of appointment as 15.09.2010, whereas the petitioner has been initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-I on 22.07.1998. Thus, the petitioner seems to have lost seniority of about 12 years. 2.

Given the limited dispute that the petitioner has and the fact that the petitioner has made representation to the authorities concerned. 3.

Let the Respondent No. 02 and 03 get the original service record of

the petitioner and verify the date of appointment and grant proper seniority to the petitioner from the date of his initial appointment i.e., 22.07.1998.

4.

Let the Respondent No. 02 and 03 take appropriate decision at the earliest, preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. Needless to mention that since the petitioner now stands absorbed in the Education Department. The direction is given to the Respondent No. 02 and 03 to contact the concerned authority in the Panchayat Department also if required to verify the original date of appointment of the petitioner. 5.

With the aforesaid observations, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge yasmin