← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2144/2012dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

M.L.Sonwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2019-07-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmseARH AT BILAsPUR

WRIT PETITION ( c ) No. Q WW OF 2012 PETITIONER:

/ M.L.50nwani, aged about 5O years, S/o. LaTe B.L.Sonwani.

Presenfly posied and working as Disfric'r InsTiTuTe of \q/y/Zw/Pr'incipai, 3/ TM;

Educa'rion and Training (DIET) Beme'rara, P.S.

Beme'rar'a Dis'rr'ic'r .

Bemefa'r'a. (C.G.)

VERSUS

1./5Ta're of ChhaT'risgarh, Through The Secrefary, Deparf'menf of School EducaTion, New Manfralaya, Mahanadi Bhawant Naya Raipur P.S.

Mandir Hasoud. Disfric'r- Raipur (C.G.) 21/51'01'6 of Chha'r'risgarh, Through The Secrefary, Deparfmenf of Revenue and Disas'rer Managemen'r, New ManTraIaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur P.S.

Mandir Hasoud'

DisfricfRaipur (C.G.) 3.

Commissioner, Raipur Division.

Raipur K \ (6.6.) , 4.

Collecfor Beme'rara.

Disfricf v, Bemefara (C.G.) 5.

Shri M.L.GupTa, Priegenfiy posTed and , working as JoinT Collec'ror.

I.

CoHecTora're-'

Bemefara.

DisTricf~ Beme'rarai'fC'G.) j

@ '

i"

WRIT PETITION UNDER A RTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA X f \ 'k

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 2144 of 2012 3?.

- M.L.Sonwani, S/o B.L.Sonwani, Aged About Year's, Presently posted and working as Principal, Distt.

Institute Of Education And Training (DIET), Bemetara, RS. Bemetara, Distt Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

.

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Deptt Of Schooi Education, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Ps Mandir Hasoud, Distt Raipur, Chhattisgarh .

State Of C.G., Through the Secretary, Deptt Of Revenue And Disaster Management, New Mantralaya, Mahandai Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Ps Mandir Hasoud, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh .

Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur, Chhattisgarh .

Collector Bemetara, District: Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 5.

Shri M.L.Gupta, Presently posted and working as Joint Collector, Collectorate Bemetara, District: Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents 23/07/201 9 None for the petitioner even in the second call. Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. G.A. for the State.

Since no representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, despite repeated call this Court has no other way except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/- '

' 'Tié'EJtafrTBhadurn Judge Jyoti