← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/664/2018disposed off

Divya Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-01-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 664 of 2018 Divya Kumar Sahu S/o S/o Shri Nanku Das Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Alhanavagaon, Post- Gatapara Kala, Tahsil And PostKhairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Home/ Police Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, P. S. And Post Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Additional Director General Police ( A- Dgp), Chhattisgarh, Armed Force (C. A. F.) Police Headquarters (P H Q), Near Mahanadi Bhawan, P. S. And Post- Rakhi, New Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Superintendent Of Police (S. P.) S T F Baghera, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. GA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 18/01/2018 1.

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider his objection regarding petitioner's claim for grant of appropriate seniority on the basis of petitioner having completed 10 years and number of Junior persons having been included in the list. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit at this stage the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to examine the petitioner's claim and take appropriate action for including him in the seniority list. If petitioner submit a fresh representation taking all the grounds which have been raised under the petition or available under the law, to respondent No. 2 within a period of 30 days, it would be decided within a

period of 60 days.

3.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit