High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2187/2012infructuous

Dileshwar Aadile v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS

2018-07-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC NO.2187 of 2012 Dileshwar Aadile S/o. Shri Kunjram Aadile aged about 47 years, Occupation-Ex-Up Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Chaitma Janpad Panchayat Pali, R/o. Village - Chaitma, Thana-Pali, Distt.-Korba (CG) ----Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Building Raipur (CG)

2. Collector, Korba, Distt.-Korba (CG)

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)/Prescribed Officer Katghora, Distt.-Korba (CG)

4. Tahsildar, Pali, Distt.-Korba (CG)

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pali, Distt.-Korba (CG)

6. Vyasnarayan, Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma,

7. Sudhiya Bai Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma

8. Manohar Singh Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma

9. Sunita Nishad Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 10.

Sarita Kaiward Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 11.

Tul Kunwer Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 12.

Chhatrapal Singh Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 13.

Sandhya Singh Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 14.

Kamalo Bai Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 15.

Mithilesh Kaiwart Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 16.

Mantori Bai Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 17.

Dilbai Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 18.

Kripalsingh Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 19.

Neeli Bai Panch Gram Panchayat Chaitma 20.

Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Chaitma Respondent No.5 to 20 are residence of Village -Chaitma, Thana and Vikashkhand Pali, Distt.-Korba (CG) ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr.Sunil Sahu For State :

Mr.R.N.Pusty, Govt.Advodate For Res.No.6 &8 to 20 :

Mr.C.P.Lahrey, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order on Board 16/07/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge B/-