Shyamdas Manikpuri v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 793 of 2018 Shyamdas Manikpuri S/o S/o Late Shri Sukritdas Manikpuri Aged About 50 Years R/o Village And Post- Salonikala, P. S. Bilaigarh, Tehsil- Bilaigarh District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan , Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Deputy Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar DistrictBaloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Manish Nigam, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 23/01/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No. 2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit