High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2750/2012disposed off

Dilip Rangari And Or.S v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2021-09-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2750 of 2012

1. Dilip Rangari S/o Shri Amrit Lal Rangari, Aged about 40 years, R/o Station Para Ward No. 9, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

2. Bhushan Lal Sahu S/o Shri Rikhi Ram Sahu, Aged about 36 years, R/o Tulsipur, Sai Mandir Gali, Ward No. 16, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

3. Manoj Markam S/o Late Shri Manjeet Singh, Aged about 40 years, R/o Basantpur, Ward No. 38, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E. Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Mission Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shikhsa Mission (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan) Avantika Vihar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Director, State Council of Educational Research & Training Chhattisgarh, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Principal, District Institute of Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioners :- Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate For State :- Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 06/09/2021

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the act of respondents for inclusion of post of petitioners i.e. Block Resources Centre Coordinator with that of Block Resouces Person as mentioned in letter dated 22/10/2011 (Annexure P/5) issued by respondent No. 3 and letter dated 20/04/2012 (Annexure P/7) issued by respondent No. 2 is illegal because the job of Block Resources Centre Coordinator is different from Block Resource Person and for that, the petitioners have already made representation but that has not been considered and decided.

3. Be that as it may, respondent No. 1 is directed to consider and dispose of petitioners'

representation within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Petitioners are at liberty to file additional representation (if any) within two weeks from today.

4. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet