High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/6/2014dismissed

Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Karmchari Sangh Durg Through Its President Shri Sachindra Kumar Ambast v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS

2021-06-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet W.P.(C) No. 6 of 2014 Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Karmchari Sangh, Ambikapur, Surguja, Through its :

1. President Shri Sachindra Kumar Ambast, S/o. Shri Indradev Ambast, Aged About 54 Years, R/o. Babupara, Jail Road Ambikapur,, P.S. & Post Ambikapur, Distt Surguja, Chhattisgarh, Pin 497001

2. Secretary Shri R.K.Khare, S/o. Shri R.M.Khare, Aged About 48 Years, R/o. Kedarpur, Bhatti Road, Ambikapur, P.S., Tahsil & Post Ambikapur, Distt Surguja, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post And Thana Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies Chhattisgarh, 2nd Floor Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur, Post And Thana Naya Raipur, Distt Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank, Jagdalpur, Through The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Sahkari Bank, Deviganj Road, Thana And Post Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

4. Reserve Bank Of India, Through The Principal Chief General Manager, Having Its Central Office At Central Office Building Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Post And Thana Fort, Mumbai, 400001

5. National Bank Of Agriculture And Rural Development Bank (NABARD), Through The Managing Director, Having Its Head Off At Bandra Kurla Complex Post And Thana Bandra (East) Mumbai 400051, Maharashtra

6. Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Krishi Avam Gramin Vikas Bank, Raipur 1st Floor, BBlock RDA Building, Sharda Chowk Thana Mahoudapara Tahsil And Post Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

7. Zila Sahkari Krishi Avam Gramin Vikas Bank, Ambikapur Behind Akashwani Kendra Chopra Para Ambikapur, Thana Gandhinagar Post Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents 25.06.2021 None for the Petitioners.

Mr. S. Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. Mr. Sunil Tripathi, Advocate for the Respondent No.7.

Despite repeated calls, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/- Li (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ashok