High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2507/2010dismissed

Smt.Preeti Shende v. Union Of India And ORS.

2019-01-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2507 of 2010 Smt. Preeti Shende W/o Shri Ajay Shende, aged about 30 years (Before marriage Preeti Thawre) R/o Present Address Near New Book Depot, Main Road, Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (CG). Permanent Address-Ambedkar Ward No.11, Sausar, PS and Tahsil Sausar, Distt. Chhindwara (MP).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Of India Through Secretary Personnel Public Grievance and Pension Department of Personnel and Training North Block, New Delhi.

2. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Law And Legislative Affairs Department DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG).

3. State of Madhya Pradesh through The Secretary Law And Legislative Affairs Department Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (MP).

4. Hon'ble High Court Of Chhattisgarh Through the Registrar General High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur (CG).

5. The District and Session Judge Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (CG).

6. Hon'ble High Court of MP through the Registrar General, High Court of MP.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Aditya Tiwari, Advocate.

For Respondent No.3 :

Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Advocate.

SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 28.01.2019

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is confined to her request of she be allocated to the State of Madhya Pradesh.

2. Perusal of records would show that infact the petitioner was appointed in the State of Chhattisgarh itself. Her appointment also was much after the State was established.

3. Given the said facts, the question of allocation does not arise as the

allocation could be made only in respect of those persons who were employed by the erstwhile State Government and have been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh. Moreover, from the record it appears that the claim of the petitioner was already considered by the respondents and on due consideration the same stands rejected.

4. In view of above, this court does not find any strong case made out by the petitioner for grant of the relief that has been sought. The writ petition fails and accordingly stands dismissed. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder