← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhSA/64/2007dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Nohar Alias Bablu Mishra And Others v. Raj Kumar Sahu And Another

2018-11-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Second Appeal No. 64 of 2007 Ram Khilawan Mishra (since deceased) through LRs. 1-A. Nohar alias Bablu Mishra, aged 44 years, son of late Shri Ram Khilawan, 1-B Manoj Mishra, aged 36 years, son of late Shri Ram Khilawan, 1-C Badri Prasad Mishra, aged about 34 years, son of late Shri Ram Khilawan All are residenets of Pathakpara, Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 1-D Smt. Nirmala Pandey, aged 52 years, wife of Shri Surendra Pandey, resident of Bodri, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 1-E Smt. Radha Dubey, aged 50 years, wife of late Shri Ramakant Pandey, resident of village Dabo, Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 1-F Smt. Geeta Dubey, aged 40 years, wife of Shri Prakash Dubey, resident of Bhurki, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) 1-G Smt. Sita Dwivedi, aged 38 years, wife of Shri Pramod Kumar Dwivedi, resident of near Amit Riksaw Garrage, Vikasnagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2.

Raj Kumar (since deceased) through LRs.

2-A Smt. Gayatri Mishra, aged 48 years, wife of late Raj Kumar. 2-B Anil Mishra, aged 29 years, son of late Raj Kumar 2-C Sushil Mishra, aged 27 years son of late Raj Kumar. All above No. 2-A, 2-B and 2-C are residents of village Patahkpara, Ramgopal Tiwari Ward, Mungeli, Tahsil and District Mungeli (C.G.) 3.

Vijay Kumar, aged 45 years, son of Shri Ram Khilawan Mishra, All residents of Ramgopal Tiwari Ward, Mungeli, tehsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ----Appellants/plaintiffs

Versus

1.

Raj Kumar Sahu, aged 38 years, son of Shri Ramadhar Sahu, resident of Sardar Patel Ward Mungeli, tehsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondents/defendants.

For Appellants : None For State : Shri Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 01/11/2018 (1) Even after the mater was called out for hearing in the second round, none appeared on behalf of the appellants, therefore, in these circumstances, this court has no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution. (2) Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-