Vijay Prakash Burman v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 139 of 2021 Vijay Prakash Burman S/o Shri Fakir Burman, Aged About 42 Years Occupation - Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) Government Primary School, Akbartola, Block Baramkela, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Police Station - Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) Police Station - Raipur ,District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, District Raigah, Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh For Petitioner :
Mr. Atul Pandey, Advocate For State :
Mr. Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Addl. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 01.02.2021
1. Heard.
2. The limited relief sought by the petitioner in this petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the arrears of pay which the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay granted
to the petitioner.
3. According to counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was entitled for an amount of Rs.29,058/- as arrears of pay which till date has not been released. The petitioner has been approaching the authorities in the department, but till date no steps have been taken by the authorities concerned.
4. Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No. 2 to 4 to take appropriate decision so far as arrears of pay that the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay that is taken place, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
5. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondents No.2 to 4 so far as order passed by this court is concerned.
6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai