← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/424/2021disposed off

Nandkumar Ramteke v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-02-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS NO. 424 OF 2021 1.

Nandkumar Ramteke, S/o Shri Narayan Ramteke, aged about 52 years, working as Teacher (L.B.) and posted at Government Middle School Baurla, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (CG) 2.

Bhuwan Lal Dhruw, S/o Shri Shyamlal Dhruw, aged about 51 years, working as Teacher (L.B.) and posted at Government Middle School Tendubay, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (CG) 3.

Ghanshyam Dewangan, S/o Shri Punaram Dewangan, aged about 49 years, working as Teacher (L.B.) and posted at Government Middle School Litipara, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (CG) 4.

Smt. Janki Sahu, W/o Shri Gopla Krishna Sahu, aged about 52 years, working as Teacher (L.B.) and posted at Government Middle School Kaundkera, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (CG) ... Petitioners versus 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Panchayat &Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2.

Director, Directorate of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3.

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (CG) 4.

Block Education Officer, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (CG) 5.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (CG) ... Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Rahul Jha, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board /02/2021 1.

The defaults pointed out by the Registry of this Court in the instant case stand ignored as of now.

2.

With the consent of learned Counsels appearing for their respective parties, heard the matter finally at admission stage itself. 3.

The limited grievance of Petitioners in the present Writ Petition is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed, but they have not been given the same till date. 4.

Given the limited grievance raised, let Petitioners make a detailed representation in this regard to Respondents No. 2 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of Petitioners.

5.

With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) /sharad/ JUDGE