← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/15/2015disposed off

Bharti Sahu And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2021-01-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 15 of 2015

1. Bharti Sahu W/o Ajay Sahu, Aged about 26 years, D/o Firatoo Ram R/o Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Old Bhilai, Civil and Revenue Distt. Durg , Chhattisgarh.

2. Smt. Prem Lata Sahu, W/o Shri Navin Sahu, Aged about 34 years.

3. Navin Sahu S/o Shri R.L. Sahu, Aged about 34 years.

No. 2 and 3 are R/o Qtr. No. M/122, Old Medical Colony, Titli Chowk, Bilaspur, P.S. City Kotwali, Bilaspur, Civil and Revenue Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Komal Kumar Sahu, S/o Firatoo Ram, Aged about 36 years, R/o Gandhi Nagar, Bhilai 3, P.S. Old Bhilai, Civil and Revenue Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioners

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Home Department (Police), Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2.

Superintendent of Police, Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

3.

Station House Officer, Mahila Thana, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents

For Petitioners :- Mr. Uttam Pandey, Advocate For State :- Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 25/01/2021

1. Heard.

2. Mr. Uttam Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that though offence under Sections 4 and 5 of Chhattisgarh Tonahi Pratadna Nivaran Act, 2005 against the petitioners pursuant to which investigation is going on, but petitioners' version is not being taken and no explanation has been sought from them, as such, they may be allowed to make a representation before the Superintendent of Police, Durg and submit necessary documents in support of the fact that they have not committed the aforesaid alleged offence.

3. Be that as it may, petitioners are at liberty to make a representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police who will look into the matter and consider their representation in accordance with law.

4. With the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet