Ghanshyam Prasad Tiwari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No 1525 of 2017 Ghanshyam Prasad Tiwari S/o Late Shri Kamalakant Tiwari, Aged About 33 Years R/o Village And Post Malhar, Block, Tahsil And Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Cooperative Societies, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Bank Maryadit, Raipur (Apex Bank) Through Tis Managing Director, Indira Gandhi Vyavasayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. National Bank For Agriculture And Rural Development, Through Its Chief General Manager, Pithariya Complex, K. K. Road, Phaphadih Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Indiravati Bhawan, New Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh

5. District Central Cooperative Bank, Bilaspur Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

6. The Collector, Bilaspur Being Officer- In- Charge Of District Central Cooperative Bank, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

7. Abhishek Tiwari, S/o Gopal Prasad Tiwari, Aged About 40 Years Posted As Chief Executive Officer In District Central Cooperative Bank, Bilaspur, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate For State :

Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 12/12/2018

1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to

obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered him on a lower post or on the same post.

3. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved