High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/944/2005disposed off

N.P.Soni v. State And ORS.

2018-01-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 944 of 2005 Narayan Prasad Soni S/o Shri Ramanand Soni alias Phagua Ram Soni, Aged about 46 years, Ex Forester, Chhura Range, East Raipur (T) Division, Raipur (MP) R/o Ward No.13, Ambedkar Chowk Gariaband (Tehsil Gariaband Distt. Raipur) MP ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary, Forest Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP)

2. Conservator of Forests, Raipur Circle, Raipur (MP)

3. Divisional Forest Officer, East Raipur (T) Division, Raipur (MP)

4. Shri V.M.Ambade, IFS The then SDO (F) Gariaband Sub Division cum Presenting Officer Now posted as Divisional Forest Officer, Production Division, Ambikapur (MP)

5. Shri R.K.Shrivastava, IFS, The then Sub-Divisional Forest Officer cum Enquiry Officer, Mainpur, East Raipur (T) Division, HQ Gariaband (Tehsil Gariaband Distt. Raipur) MP Through : Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Madhya Pradesh, Satpura Bhawan, Bhopal (MP)

6. Shri D.K.Sahu, Forest Ranger, Range Officer, The Then RQ Territorial Chhura (Tehsil Gariaband) (Distt. Raipur) MP Now Range Officer, Production Raisgaon, Dhamtari Production Division, HQ Risgaon (Tehsil Dhamtari Distt. Raipur) MP.

---- Respondents Smt. Savita Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 16/01/2018 This petition was filed by the petitioner aggrieved by order of the disciplinary

authority, by which, the petitioner was dismissed from service. At the time when this petition was filed, appeal of the petitioner has remained pending. In the return, it has been disclosed, which has not been denied by the petitioner that the appeal of the petitioner has been partly allowed, the petitioner has been reinstated in service though, minor penalty has been imposed. This order, passed subsequently, has not been challenged in this petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to inform the Court whether the order passed in appeal is challenged in a separate writ petition. He submits that at present, he has no instructions. In that view of the matter, nothing remains to be decided in this petition. This petition, as having been rendered infructuous, is accordingly disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti