Mukesh Kumar Agrawal @ Appu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 141 of 2020 • Mukesh Kumar Agrawal @ Appu S/o Shri Gigraj Agrawal Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Pratappur, Thana And Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : Police Station Pratappur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent For Applicant :
Mr. Samjay Agrawal, Adv.
For Respondent/State :
Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam, PL.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 04/02/2020
1. The accused/applicant has moved this first bail application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 170/2019 registered at Police Station Pratappur, DistrictSurajpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 21 (C) of the NDPS Act.
2. The prosecution story, in brief is that, on the basis of information received by the informant police personnel searched and seized 470 bottles of Oneraey company Phencyres Cough Syrup from the Motorcycle bearing registration No. CG-15-DB-9291 of the present applicant and seized 720 bottles of Phencyres Cough Syrup from the Motorcycle bearing registration No. CG-15-CZ-6661 of the other co-accused. Thereafter, offence has been registered against the present applicant and other co-accused person.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant
is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that there is no previous criminal antecedent against the present applicant. The applicant is in jail since 12.11.2019, there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future, therefore, the present appellant may be released on bail.
4. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.
6. Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, facts and circumstances of the case, detention period of applicant and further considering the facts that the applicant is in jail since 12.11.2019 and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed.
7. Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one local surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge H.L. Sahu