← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/152/2020withdrawn

Satnam Singh Randhava v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-03-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 152 of 2020 • Satnam Singh Randhava S/o Balwant Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o F- 240, Vikaspuri New Delhi (India), District : New Delhi, Delhi.

---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station City Kotwali, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent MCRC No. 171 of 2020 • Satnam Singh Randhava S/o Balwant Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o F-240 Vikaspuri New Delhi India, District : New Delhi, Delhi.

---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station Kota District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent MCRC No. 290 of 2020 • Satnam Singh Randhava S/o Balwant Sing Aged About 55 Years R/o F-240 Vikaspuri New Delhi India, District : New Delhi, Delhi.

---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent MCRC No. 299 of 2020 • Satnam Singh Randhava S/o Balwant Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o F- 240 Vikaspuri New Delhi (India), District : New Delhi, Delhi, ---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer Police Station Torwa, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent MCRC No. 310 of 2020 • Satnam Singh Randhava S/o Balwant Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o F-240, Vikaspuri New Delhi India, District : New Delhi, Delhi.

---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Applicant :

Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Mr. Sameer Sharma Dy. G.A. and Mr. Akhtar Hussain, PL.

Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 05/03/2020

1. Since in the aforesaid bail applications, the applicant is one and same and arise from the same incident, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw present bail applications with direction to the trial Court to dispose of the matter as early as possible.

3. State counsel has no objection to the preposition put-forth by the applicant.

4. Accordingly, the MCRCs are dismissed as withdrawn with direction to the Court below to make all the endevour for deciding the cases as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 6 months, from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. Registry is directed to send the copy of this order to the Court below concerned.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge H.L. Sahu