L.S.Patel v. Union Of India And ORS.
181 -^ -^ BEFORE THE HONABLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) INTHEMATTEROF.........
WPNO. ^../...OF20e2-''
1.
L.S. PATELAged 57 S/0 LATE G.R. PATEL PLOTNO. 105 SECTOR2, GITANJALI NAGAR, .:..
RAIPUR(C.G.) PETITIONER
Versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF FNDIA DEPT. OF ANIMAL HUSBANDARY AND DAIRY, KRISHI BHAVAN NEW DELHI ^.
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF COOPBRATIVES, DKS, MANTRALYA, RAIPUR (C.G.) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE 00VT., OF M.P.
DEPT. OF COOPERATIVES BHOPAL.
^.
^r .^ ^^:';'
.^^•/ ^^ ^^€-> '^^'"
REGISTRAR COOPERATIVES, STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, KRISHINAGAR, RAIPURC.G.
REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVES, STATE OF M.P.
VINDYACHAL BHAWAN, BHOPAL.
^ "3*& ^ THECHAIRMAN, M.P. STATECO. OPERATIVEDAIRYFEDRATIONLIMITED, DUGDH BHAWAN DUGDH MARG, HABIB GANJ BHOPAL(MP) ^ M.P. STATE CO-OPERATIVE. DAIRY FEDERATION LTD. THROUGH-THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DUGDH BHAWAN, DUGDH MARG, HABIB GANJ, BHOPAL MP) ^THE CHAIRMAN, RAIPURDUGDH SANGH, BMY, CHARODA,URLA DIST. DURG(CG)
3a iZ-RAIPUR DUGDH SANGH, THROUGH-GENERAL MANAGER BMY,CHARODA, URLA DIST. DURG(CG) i^SMT. ARUNA SHARMA,(IAS) (FORMER M. D., MPCDF) PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL.
RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN APROPMATE WMT ORDER OR DIRECTION AS MY LORDSfflPS DEEM FIT.
^llSSa k'&'
NAFR ":i y\\'a \ '•r-X-'
;6R^ HIGH COURT OFi^KlHATTISQARH^BILASPUR f\ Wff>j .83^of20Q3 L.S.Patel -- Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. W -- Respondent For Petitioner Nahe, For Respondent/State Sli|i jid Ali, Panel Lawyer.
Hon^ble Shri Justice PrashaniKumarJMishra QrderQiTBoard 11/02/2016 1) The matter was p^ssedVoveionce in absence of any representation on behalf of|;f:he petitiqner. No one appears fbr the petitioner even in the secoE^.SaW.:::f ^ sl'
2) In the circumstances; there is no other option left with the Court, but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. iSMSSgSl 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd//- ,;,.
Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge