Somaru Ram Solanki Anors v. State Of C.G. And ORS

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 2380 OF 2013 1.

Somaru Ram Solanki, S/o Shri Lt. Supari Ram Solanki, aged about 34 years, Peon, General Nursing Training Center, Jagdalpur, PS Jagdalpur, Dist Bastar (CG) 2.

Shatrughan Bhagel S/o Shri Lt. Manglo Ram Baghel, aged about 29 years, Peon, Community Health Centre, Bastar, PS and District Bastar (CG) ... Petitioners versus 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Health, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, PS Abhanpur, Dist Raipur (CG) 2.

Chief Medical and Health Officer, Office of Chief Medical and Health, Jagdalpur, PS Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) 3.

Ghanshyam Yadav, Assistant Grade-III, Primary Health Centre, Kapanagar (Community Health Centre, Kelepal) PS Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG) 4.

Smt. Satya Kashyap, Assistant Grade-III, Primary Health Centre, Nagarnaar (Community Health Centre, Nangur) PS Jagdalpur, Dist. Bastar (CG) 5.

Rupesh Kumar Bambode, Assistant Grade-III, Primary Health Centre, Belar (Community Health Centre, Lohandiguda), PS Jagdalpur, Dist. Bastar (CG) 6.

Lalman Kashyap, Assistant Grade-III, Primary Health Centre, Mangnaar (Community Health Center, Bakaavand) PS Jagdalpur, Dist. Bastar (CG) 7.

Anil Kumar Beck, Assistant Grade-III, Primary Health Centre, Mawali Bhata (Community Health Centre, Tokapaal), PS Jagdalpur, Dist. Bastar (CG) ... Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. CJK Rao, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Mr. Ishan Verma, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/02/2020 1.

Though the present writ petition was filed way back in the year 2013 challenging the order dated 6.3.2013 (Annexure P-1) that was an order of promotion granted to the private respondents, today when the present writ petition came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time the petitioners do not intend to challenge the impugned order dated 6.3.2013 any further. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners further prays that now that there are a large number of vacancies available in the department and the petitioners fulfilling the requisite eligibility criteria, their purpose would be served if the respondent authorities are directed to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion against the existing vacancies subject to their fulfilling the requisite eligibility criteria. 3.

To the limited prayer that the petitioners have made, learned State Counsel does not have any objection.

4.

Accordingly, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion taking into consideration the existing vacancies as on today, subject to the petitioners' seniority and fulfilling the eligibility criteria required for the same. The respondent authorities are expected to take a decision in this regard at the earliest. 5.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge /sharad/