← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/7445/2011disposed off

Kailash Gabel v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2018-07-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.7445 of 2011 Kailash Gabel, S/o Granth Kumar Gabel, aged about 33 years, Police Station & Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Home (C.) Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)

2. The Additional Secretary, Home Department, State Government of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)

3. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)

4. The Superintendent of Police, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)

5. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

Mr. Manoj Jaiswal, Advocate.

For Respondents/State: Mr. Arun Sao, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 11/07/2018

1. The petitioner's application for grant of armed license has been rejected by the impugned order of the State Government.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order impugned is unsustainable and bad in law, as no reasons have been recorded.

3. Learned State counsel would support the impugned order.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

5. A careful perusal of the record would reveal that no reasons have been assigned while rejecting the application filed by the petitioner. It ought to have been disposed of by a speaking and reasoned order.

6. In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is

remitted back to the State Government to consider the application afresh and to pass a reasoned order within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated herein-above. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma