Ashok Kumar Suryavanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.934 of 2012 • Ashok Kumar Suryavanshi, S/o Late Shri Firtu Ram Suryavanshi, aged about 50 years, Occupation-Subedar (M) working under the Office of Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Home and Police Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)

2. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. The Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

4. The Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

5. Additional Superintendent of Police/Dying Disbursing Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

6. The Deputy Director, Treasury, Account and Pension, Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent-State Mr. Avinash Singh, PL Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 24/06/2021

1.

At the outset, Mr. Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, would fairly submit that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, as such no cause of action survives for adjudication.

2.

The statement made by Mr. Tiwari is placed on record.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Nirala