Vinod Sharma And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

•®tB^^nc INTHEHIGMCOUI^(3RCHMA1TISGARHAT8ILASPUR (•CMHAmgGARHy WRIT PEtmON N0. S-S 1/2005 PETmONEKS Vinod Sharma, aged abOut 58 years^son of Shri Kedarnath Sharma, working as Chairrnan, PiGCadily Hotel Private Limited, G.E.

Road, Mahoba Bazar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) w w w Shyam Sunder Sharma, aged about 45 years, son of Shri KedarnatH Sharma, workirig as Managihg Directoi-, Piccadily Hbtel Private 1-imitecf, G.E. Rc@d, MalToba?

Bazar,;

Raipur (Chhattisgarti) R.K.

Sharma, aged abdut 45years, son of Shri Gopal Chahdra Sharma, workirig as Manager, Piecadily Hotel Private Limited, G.E. Road, Mahoba Bazar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^- Bit»*«u'

VERSUS

RESFQNDENTS State ofChhattisgarh, through :

the Secretary, Department of Labour, D.K.S. Bhawah, Mantralay, Raipur(Chhattisgarh) The Labour Inspector, Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Ftaipjjr (C.G.)

The^ Assistant Labdur CQp'li"rtissjohei',£Cbmpetent Authority, Minihiurn Wages Act, 1948, Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 ^•'

:;.-:'-''t- "^&y AN'

^ NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WP No. 251 of 2005 Vinod Sharma & Ors.

-- Petitioner

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

-- Respondent For Petitioners :

. 'None ^ For-Respondent-State .:

.

Shrj^PKBhaduri, GA for the State.

For Respondent No.4, 7, 8'& •11: §hriiAshish Shrivastava, Advocate Hon'bie S>iri_Jystice_Rrashant Kumar Mishra ©rderOn Board 20/04/2016

1. The matter was pasSed ,over fi'hce in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioners.'No onfe appears for the petitioners even in the second call.

2.

In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss the writ petition forwant of prosecution.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed forwant of prosecution. Sd/- _.

^KuxnarMishra Judge Ashu Pras