Ghasiya Das Mahant v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.6531 of 2014 • Ghasiya Das Mahant, S/o Late Haricharan Das Mahant, Aged About 52 Years, Working On The Post Of Lab - Technician, Government Polytechnic Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, R/o Majharkatta, Gariyaband, Police Station And Tahsil Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh,

2. The Director, Technical Education, The Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh , District :

Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Principal, Government Polytechnic Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

4. The Principal, Government Polytechnic Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner Mr. V. K. Pandey, Advocate For Respondent-State Mr. Aditya Sharma, PL Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/10/2021 1.

Mr. V. K. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that though the petitioner has been found fit for the benefit

of time pay scale by the respondent authorities, but the order in this regard is not being issued. The petitioner has also made representation to the respondent authorities, but the same has not been considered and decided till date. Therefore, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider the case of the petitioner.

2.

Mr. Aditya Sharma, learned State counsel, would submit that if the petitioner makes a fresh representation to the respondent authorities, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously.

3.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make a fresh representation to the respondent authorities raising his grievance within a period of 2 weeks from today. On such representation being made, the respondent authorities are directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation by a reasoned and speaking order within next 6 weeks.

4.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order

as to cost (s).

5.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Nirala