H.S. Narula And Others v. Gara Chinna Pap Nidu And Others
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (L) No. 2278 of 2009
1. H.S. Narula, Chairman, D. S. Construction, 4, Laning Complex, K.M.291, National Highway-6, Village and Post Janjgiri, Charoda, Bhilai-2, Distt. Durg, CG
2. M.S. Narula, Managing Director, D.S. Construction Co., 4, Laning Complex, K.M.291, National Highway-6, Village and Post Janjgiri, Charoda, Bhilai-2, Distt. Durg, CG
3. D. S. Construction Company, 4, Laning Complex, K.M.291, National Highway-6, Village and Post Janjgiri, Charoda, Bhilai-2, Distt. Durg, CG
4. Anand Narula, Director, D.S. Vicon Ventures, Private Ltd., 4, Laning Complex, K.M.291, National Highway-6, Village and Post Janjgiri, Charoda, Bhilai-2, Distt. Durg, CG
5. Balbir Singh, Project Manager, D.S. Vicon Ventures Private Ltd., 4, Laning Complex, K.M.291, National Highway-6, Village and Post Janjgiri, Charoda, Bhilai-2, Distt. Durg, CG
6. D.S. Vicon Ventures Private Ltd., 4, Laning Complex, K.M.291, National Highway-6, Village and Post Janjgiri, Charoda, Bhilai-2, Distt. Durg, CG ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. Gara Chinna Papi Nidu
2. Gara Ramna
3. Peddi Apparao
4. Qubo Adi Narayan
5. Shiburi Rama Rao
6. Ambata Laxman
7. Ramna
8. Patiwada Gaura Naidu
9. Kaila Govind Rao 10.Gara Gauri Naidu 11.Chitro Ram Babu 12.Dona Papa Rao 13.Gara Mahesh 14.Gara Appla Naidu 15.Ramna 16.Gara Gauri Naidu 17.Kaila Simhachalam 18.Ambati Sita Ramulu 19.Gara Ramjogi Naidu 20.P. Raja Rao
21.Kailana Fantaiaya 22.Giri Govind Rao 23.Kailna Appala Naidu 24.G. Venkat Ramna 25.G. Venkat Ramna 26.Pundurutu Sheckher 27.Ali Beli Anji 28.P. Sini Rama Rao
29. Gaiti Apparao 30.Gara Simhachalam 31.Gara Govindu (through authorized person - Gara Govindu S/o Dalpadu : present address - C/o Prahlad Manikpuri, Potiakala, Kasaridih, Durg (CG) 32.Star Venus Engineers Private Ltd., C/o Navin Kumar Singrol, G-9, Adarsh Nagar, Durg, Permanent address : 202, Sai Residency, Ward No.72, in front of K.P.H.P Kukathpalli, Hyderabad, A.P. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : None For Respondents : Shri V. G. Tamaskar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 05/02/2018 There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners either in person or through their lawyer even when the matter was called on repeated occasions.
2.
In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioners, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
3.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
4.
As a result of dismissal of the petition, the interim relief granted by this Court also stands vacated.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola