Priyanka Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh Than Khamhariya v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 102 of 2018 Priyanka Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh Than Khamhariya Through Its President Rukhmani Nagvanshi Aged About 40 Years, W/o Brij Lal Nagvanshi, R/o. Ward No. 6, Yadav Para, Than Khamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2. Collector Women And Child Development Branch Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
3. Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
4. District Programme Officer, Women And Child Development Department, Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
5. Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Saja, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
6. Maa Durgeshwari Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh, Navagaon Kala, Through Its President, Pariyozna Saja, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Praveen Dhurandhar, Advocate. For State : Shri Dilman Rati Minj, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Order On Board 15/01/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that under the terms of the agreement entered into between the petitioner and respondent No. 5, Sub Divisional Officer is the competent authority to decide the disputes whereas the decision has been taken by the District Programme Officer.
(2) Be that as it may, Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue Bemetara, District Bemetara is directed to hear the parties and decide the dispute by passing reasoned and speaking order expeditiously preferabley within a period of two week from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order as the petitioner's representation is already pending consideration before the SDO, Bemetara in this regard.
(3) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-