← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1574/2013non prosecution

Snatak Mahavidyalaya Shikshan Samiti And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2019-07-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 1574 of 2013

1. Snatak Mahavidyalaya Shikshan Samiti Through The Chairman, Snatak Mahavidyalaya Shikshan Samiti, Having Its Office At D.P. Vipra College, P.S. City Kotwali, Old High Court Road, Bilaspur C.G.

2. Ram Narayan Shukla, S/o Late Shri D.P. Shukla, Aged About 84 Years Chairman, P.S. Tarbahar, Snatak Mahavidyalaya Shikshan Samiti, Having Its Office At D.P. Vipra College, Old High Court Road, Bilaspur C.G. R/o Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur C.G., ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur C.G.

2. State Of C.G. Through The Secretary, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur C.G.

3. The Collector Bilaspur, Collatrate, Bilaspur Tahsil And Dist. Bilaspur C.G.

4. Dr. J.P. Shivhare, Principal, Govt. Post Graduate Degree Girls College, P.S. Civil Line, Bilaspur, C.G.

5. Dr. S.R. Kamlesh, Principal, Govt. College, Seepat, Dist. Bilaspur, P.S. Seepat, C.G.

6. U.K. Gajendra, Junior Accounts Officer, Office Of The Commissioner, Directorate Of Higher Education, P.S. Lalganj, Raipur, C.G.

7. R.P. Shukla Accountant Class-II, Office Of The Commissioner, Directorate Of Higher Education, P.S. Lalganj Raipur C.G.

---- Respondents 04/07/2019 None for the Petitioner.

Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. G.A. for the State.

Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for

want of prosecution.

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Jyoti