← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/285/2017dismissed

Amin Shekhani Memon v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-06-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 285 of 2017 • Amin Shekhani Memon S/o Haji Ismael Bhai, Aged About 47 Years R/o Near Vikas Complex, Transport Nagar, Post And Tehsil Korba, Police Station City Kotwali, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary Department Of Home Affairs Police, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh

2. Director General Of Police, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Inspecotor General Of Police Bilaspur Range, District- Bilaspur, Chhattistgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Superintendent Of Police, Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

5. District Magistrate Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh. , District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

6. Station House Officer, Police Station City Kotwali, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh.

7. State Of Madhya Pradesh, Through Superintendent Of Police Badwani, District- Badwani, Madhya Pradesh

8. Station House Officer Sendhwa, District- Badwani, Madhya- Pradesh , District : Barwani ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Rakesh Sahu, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 08.06.2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the State has filed their

return on 22.11.2017. He further submits that along with the return, the State has also annexed letter dated 31.10.2017 issued by the Thana Incharge, Police Station - City Kotwali, District - Korba by which the police has directed the complainant to appear before them for recording of his statement.

2. In view of the said direction issued by the Thana Incharge, City Kotwali, Korba, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Thana Incharge, City Kotwali, Korba between 10th July to 15th July, 2021 for recording of his statement.

3. In view of such development, nothing survives for adjudication by this Court.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. st Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge kishore