Amarjeet Kurre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 93 of 2019

1. Amarjeet Kurre S/o Late Son Sai Aged About 39 Years Working As Ward Boy, Community Health Centre, Premnagar, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

2. Ravi Narayan Thakur, S/o Shyam Prasad Thakur, aged about 37 years, working as Ward Boy, Community Health Centre, Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur C.G.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Health Services, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer Surajpur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Medical And Health Officer Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

5. Block Medical Officer Premnagar, Disrtict- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

6. Block Medical Officer Bhaiyathan, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner :

Shri CJK Rao, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. AG with Ms. Sunita Jain, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 09/01/2019 1.The petitioners through the present writ petition is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for regularization. Though, petitioners have been appointed in accordance with the rules governing the field and have put in more than 15 years of continuous service on contractual basis. According to the petitioners they also fulfill all the eligibility criteria for the post against which they are working and having put in more than 15 years of service. The petitioners should have been considered for regularization

keeping in view the circular of the State Government dated 05.03.2008 and subsequent circulars in respect of the regularization.

2. Given the limited grievance of the petitioners this Court is of the opinion that no purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending rather ends of justice would meet if the respondent No. 1 is directed to take a decision in respect of the petitioners and other similarly placed persons keeping in view the circulars dated 05.03.2008 or subsequent circulars arising out of the same dealing with the issue of the regularization. Let this exercise be completed within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Rohit JUDGE