Ikram Ahmed v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4636 of 2008 • Ikram Ahmed, (wrongly mentioned as Mohammad Ikram Ahmed in the impugned order) S/O Shri Islam Ahmed, aged about 33 years, R/O Gazi Nagar, Ward No.1, Biragon, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Urban Development Department, D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.)

2. The Additional Collector Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Certification), District Raipur (C.G.)

4. The Tahsildar, Dharsiwan District Raipur (C.G.)

5. Nagar Panchayat Birgaon, through the Chief Executive Officer, District Raipur (C.G.)

6. Dr. Shakil (as per impugned order as no description is given in both the impugned orders) through the Additional Collector, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.)

7. Mahadev Kanwre, S/O Shri Suryadev Kanwre, aged about 46 years, Additional Collector, Raipur, Distt.-Raipur CG ---- Respondents ___________________________________________________________________ For Petitioner :

None.

For Respondent No.5 :

Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate.

For Respondent No.6 :

Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 02/01/2020

1. None for the petitioner even in the second round.

2. According to learned counsel for the respective respondents, this case has become infructuous by lapse of time, as the statement is not disputed, this petition is disposed off as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Ravi