High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/45/2018disposed off

Shankarlal Agrawal v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-01-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.45 of 2018 Shankarlal Agrawal Son Of Late Harphool Agrawal, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Chandrakhuri, Post Baitalpur, Tahsil Patharia Chowki, Sargaon, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.), Patharia, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Patharia, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.

5. Atmaram Vani, Son Of Late Babulal Vani, Sarpanch, R/o Village Chandrakhuri, Post Baitalpur, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.

6. The Gram Panchayat, Chadrakhuri, Through Its Secretary, Incumbent, Block Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Malay Kumar Bhaduri, Advocate For State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 10/01/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be allowed to file application/complaint before the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Patharia, District Mungeli under Section 40 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 against respondent No.5.

(2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(3) Be that as it may, petitioner is permitted to file application/complaint before the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Patharia, District Mungeli under Section 40 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 against the respondent No.5 and, in turn, Sub Divisional Officer shall consider and decide the application/complaint of the petitioner in accordance with law after hearing the parties, expeditiously from the date of receipt of application/complaint.

(4) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-