Brijraj v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.74 of 2018

1. Brijraj Son Of Late Anurup Yadav, Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Gumga, Post Dandgaon, P. S. And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

2. Smt. Janki, W/o Late Ramjeet Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Gumga, Post Dandgaon, P. S. And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

3. Vijay, Son Of Late Sukhnandan Yadav, Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Gumga, Post Dandgaon, P. S. And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

4. Ramvilash Yadav, Son Of Late Sukhram Yadav, Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Gumga, Post Dandgaon, P. S. And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue , Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector, Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer/ Land Acquisition Officer, Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Tahsildar, Udaipur, Tahsil Udaipur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.

5. The National Highway Authority Raipur, National Highway No. 130, Bilaspur- Ambikapur Road,

6. The Sub Divisional Officer (P. W. D. ), Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, Deputy Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 11/01/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that

the petitioners' land has been acquired by respondent authorities, but in lieu of which neither land has been given nor compensation has been paid to them, against which they have made representation before the respondent authorities, but the same has not been considered and decided till now and, therefore, direction may be issued to the said authority to decide the same expeditiously. (2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(3) Be that as it may, the Collector, Surguja is directed to consider and decide the petitioners' representation in accordance with law after hearing the parties expeditiously within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioners are at liberty to file additional representation, if any before the Collector in support of their case.

(4) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-