Manoharlal Jindal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 64 of 2018 Manohar Lal Jindal, S/o Late Shri Pokarmal Jindal, aged about 46 years, R/o Jindal Agency, Naharpara Road, Sanjay Gandhi Chowk Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department of Urban Administration, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. Raipur Municipal Corporation, through its Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr.Sunil Otwani, Advocate.

For Respondent No. 2 :

Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 11/01/18 1.

Learned counsel for the respondent - Municipal Corporation seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the notice dated 13.12.2017 (AnnexureP/7) with liberty to take action in accordance with law. 2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed.

4.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty reserved in favour of the respondent - Corporation. It is pertinent to mention here that the Corporation shall consider and keep in view the decision

rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Madhavrao Scindia v. Ramesh Jatav and Others1 regarding demarcation.

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka (2006) 1 SCC 379