M/S T.T.G.Industries Ltd. v. Union Of India And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR:C.G.

WRITPETITION No./C"?.?

/2006

IN THE MATTER OF ;

M/s T.T.G. Industries Limited, a company duly incorporated under the relevant provisions of the companies Act, 1956, ^ having its Registered OfEce at TTG House, College Road, CHENNAI - 600 006.

Tamil Nadu, India.

PETITIONERS , ^0^ ^^ ,?.>'"

y Vs.

RESPONDENTS:

1.

Union of India represented by the Secretary of Govemment of India, Ministry of Pinance, Department of Customs & Central Excise, New Delhi.

The Commissioner (Appeals -II), Customs 8s CentraJ Excise, Central Excise Building, Dhamtari Road, Tikrapara, RAIPUR, (Chhattisgarh) 2.

The Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise, Central Excise Building, Dhamtari Road, Tikrapara, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).

3.

PETITIONER UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUA^CE OF WRIT IN THE WATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY AND/OR

ORDER

(S| AND/OR FOR DIRECTIOW (S) IW THE WATURE OP WIRTS.

fl

HIGiiCOURTOFCHHATTLSGARH. BU-ASPUR W.P.No.1532 of 2006 PETmONER M/s T.T.G. Industries Limited «,

Versus

RESPONDENTS Union of India & others Shri Vinod Deshmukh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Manish Sharma, counsel for Union of India. SINGLE BENCH :

HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.

ORAL ORDER (02/03/2015) Petitionei-l has challenged the order passed by Commissioner of Appeals, Central Excise on 12/08/2005.

2.

Shri Sharma, learned counselfor respondents would submit that the impugned order is appealable before the Central Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) under Section 35 B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

3.

In view of the availability of alternative remedy, this writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Petitioner may avail alternative remedy along with an application for condonation of delay. - - S.d/- Prashant Kun'ar Mishfa Judge ^ '<..