Lalit Kumar Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5964 of 2017 Lalit Kumar Soni S/o Late Radhe Lal Soni Aged About 59 Years Field Assistant, C. G. State Marketing Federation, Posting At Dhan Sangrahan Kendra, Bijabata, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh , Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative Societies, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

2. The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation - 880, Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation- 880, Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri V.R.Tiwari, Advocate For State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer For Respondents 2 and 3 :

Shri Harshal Chauhan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 03/04/2018 At the outset, learned counsel for the parties would submit that this petition may be disposed off with similar direction as has been issued by this Court in batch of petitions i.e. WPS No.7126/2017 (Mahendra Kumar Sai v. State of Chhattisgarh and ors) and connected matters decided vide order dated 15/02/2018. 2.

Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is accordingly disposed off. The order passed by the appellate authority is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the appellate authority to consider each

and every ground raised by the petitioner in his appeal afresh and thereafter, to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law after hearing the parties within a period of six months from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order. The petitioner is at liberty to raise additional grounds, if any, supported by the documents, which shall be considered by the appellate authority. The petitioner is also at liberty to move an application for grant of interim relief which shall be decided by the appellate authority within one month from the date of receipt of the application. If the application is moved within one month from today, recovery shall not be made against the petitioner for a period of two months. 3.

With the aforesaid observations, this petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti