Soniya Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 511 of 2018
1. Soniya Patel W/o Manoj Kumar Patel Aged About 25 Years R/o- Q. No. F/4, Near Banjaripara C H C Lailunga, Tahsil Lailunga District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2. Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
4. Dr. C. V. Raman University, Through Its Registrar, Kargi Road, Kota, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5. Madhuri Patel Lecturer panchayat, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kotra Block Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For State:
: Mr. R.N. Pusty, Government Advocate S.B.:
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 15/01/2018
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed the M.Sc. Examination through District Education but his candidature for the post of Lecturer (Panchayat) has been rejected by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh by a non-speaking order for which he may be allowed to make representation before the Chief Executive Officer, Raigarh.
-22. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed.
4. Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh within seven days from today and, in turn, the said authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation by a reasoned and speaking order within ten days from the date of filing of the representation.
5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-