Pawan Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 138 of 2019

1. Pawan Kumar S/o Khorbahra Aged About 45 Years Working As Lecturer Panchayat, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Dumar, Block Dhamdha, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

2. Vinod Kumar Dewangan S/o Chamman Lal Dewangan Aged About 33 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb), Govt. Primary School, Limatara, Block Dhamdha, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

3. Pawan Kumar Pal S/o Shravan Kumar Pal Aged About 33 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb), Govt. Primary School, Bhatapara (Godhi), Block Dhamdha, District- Durg, Chhattisgrah., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Pushpalata Ramteke D/o Kamta Prasad Ramteke Aged About 33 Years Working As Lecturer Panchayat, Govt. Teacher H.S.S. School, Jangiri (Bmy), Block Patan District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissiner-Cum-Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Dhamdha, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Harish Khuntiya, Advocate For State :

Mr. Rahul Mishra, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 10/01/2019

1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the

petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioners shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered them on a lower post or on the same post.

3. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit