Piyush Prasad v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ANR.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.1508 of 2013 • Piyush Prasad, S/o Hari Kisto Prasad, Aged About 41 Years, Deputy Director, Local Fund Audit, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance and Planning, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, PO and PS Naya Raipur, Dist Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Commissioner, Local Fund Audit, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.), B-99, Samta Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate For Respondent-State Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Dy. AG Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 27/09/2021 1.
Mr. Anuroop Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that by the efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2.
In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Nirala