Sukdev @ Mukhdev v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 24 of 2018 • Sukdev @ Mukhdev S/o Late Sita Ram Aged About 60 Years Caste Patwa, R/o Village Sulsuli, Tahsil Wadraf Nagar, Distt. Balrampur Chhattisgarh, ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Ministry, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, Post Office- Rakhi, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh,

3. The Inspector General Of Police, Surguja Range, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.,

4. The Superintendent Of Police, Balrampur, District Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.,

5. The Additional Superintendent Of Police, Balrampur, District Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.,

6. The Station House Officer, Police Station Chalgali, Distt. Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh,

7. Pramod S/o Shri Seetaram, Aged About 40 Years Caste- Patwa, R/o Village Sulsuli, Tahsil Wasrafnagar, Distt. Balrampur Chhattisgarh,

8. Rajesh, S/o Shri Devnarayan Patwa, R/o Village Shardapur, Tahsil Wadrafnagar, Distt. Balrampur Chhattisgarh,

9. Manoj Kumar, S/o Shri Dinesh Chand, Caste- Patwa, R/o Village Sulsuli, Tahsil Wadrafnagar, Distt. Balrampur Chhattisgarh, ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri N.K. Mehta, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Adhiraj Surana, Dy. GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board

16/01/2018

1. Petitioner has preferred this petition seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to register the FIR against respondents No.7, 8 & 9 for commission of a cognizable offence as it is stated that by forged and false personification a sale deed has been registered without the knowledge of the petitioner.

2. In view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Ram Lal Narang v. State (Delhi Admn.) (AIR 1979 SC 1791) and Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others {(2014) 2 SCC 1} wherein it has been held that in such complaints/FIR disclosing commission of cognizable offence, the concerned police shall register the FIR, complete the investigation within a reasonable time, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned police to proceed in accordance with law and do the needful for completing the investigation at the earliest. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu