Gourav Kumar Gupta v. B.B.Appalraju And ANR.

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet MAC No. 929 of 2014 Gourav Kumar Gupta Versus B.B. Appalraju & Anr 14.01.2021 Shri Subhash Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Non for respondent No.1.

Shri Shailesh Tiwar, Advocate on behalf of Shri Sourabh Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.2/Insurance Company. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that service of notice upon respondent No.1 may be dispensed with as the liability to satisfy the amount of compensation is upon respondent No.2/Insurance Company.

Factual submission made by learned counsel for the appellant is not disputed by learned counsel representing respondent No.2/Insurance Company.

In view of above, service of notice upon respondent No.1 is dispensed with.

With the consent of parties, appeal is heard finally. Orders dictated separately, signed and dated. (P. R. Ramachandra Menon ) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Pawan/-