Vinod Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRR No. 17 of 2013 • Vinod Kumar S/o Anandram Kurre Aged About 28 Years R/o Vill Kurda, Tahan And Tah Malkharouda, Distt Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh S/o Through District Magistrate Janjgir Distt Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Applicant : Shri Raj Bahadur Singh, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Priyank Rathi, PL Complainant : Shri Vivek Tripathi, Advocate Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order On Board 17/07/2019 Heard on I.A. No. 01/2019, application under Section 320(5) of Cr.P.C.

This application has been filed jointly by the applicant as well as complainant Aarti Devi under Section 320(5) Cr.P.C. duly supported by affidavit for permission to compound the offence. In this application it has been stated that the entire dispute between them has been settled and complainant Aarti Devi, without any fear and undue influence does not further want to punish the applicant. The statement of both the parties have been recorded by the Additional Registrar (J) and in proof, photo ID of the complainant has been filed. The incident is of the year 2012 and the parties have compromised the matter voluntarily. The applicant has served the jail

sentence of about 29 days. For the reasons mentioned in the application, I.A. No. 01/19 is allowed.

Compounding of the offence as prayed for by the parties is permitted.

Result of this compromise would be acquittal of the applicant Vinod Kumar of the offence under Sections 458 and 354 IPC. Accordingly, the revision is allowed.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge suguna