Umesh Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 220 of 2019

1. Umesh Kumar S/o Rameshwar Prasad Aged About 27 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Kalangpur, Block Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh.

2. Gulab Singh Deshmukh S/o Shri Deendayal Deshmukh Aged About 27 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Odarsakari, Block Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 14/01/2019

1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that though the claim of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another)", but the petitioner had not completed the required 8 years of service for claiming the said benefits.

2. Given the aforesaid factual matrix, let the petitioner approach the authorities concerned, for the relief sought for, after due competition of the minimum period required, and thereafter if the authorities do not grant the relief, the petitioner would have the remedy of approaching this Court.

3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved