Kailash Nath Dewangan v. State

IN THES HIGH GOHRT OF X4DHXA PMH3SH AT JABALPUR, SECOND APK3AI, RO.

APH3LLAICT ;

EAILASH NATTI IEWAGXN son of Shivlal Sewagsn, Bx.Gonfirmed StenQ.

Typl s-fc, Colleetorate Durg, resideat of Baigapara, Tahsil Durg, Bistr-Ast Durg, M.r.

-:.

7 S E_S,_US._ ISSPCS'ilEXTS s 1.

COl.IEGTOK DORG.

2.

COtSMISSIOI-ISa EAIPIffi DIVISIffl'I,PtAIPUE. 3.

SEGHSTART TO GOVERtiffiNT OF % P.

EE1»'BNIE BBP.ABTtENT BHOPAL.

.SBCOND _AE.@AlL._TOg)SR.^GTIQiL3_Q2_ OF THE GODE OF CP/IL PEOCEBUPE..

..^_

.^ ^•^^+t ''^;^^ x ~J/ -a-s'"'^ '"•;£€^^ ^^ NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WPS No. 358 of 2005 Kailash Nath Dewangan -- Petitioner

Versus

Collector, Durg -- Respondent For Petitioner Shri G. P. Mathur, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri P. K.,B,haduri, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra OrderOnBoard 29/02/2016 1.

Learned counsel for the:peiitioneF, on instructions, would submit that with the efflux of time, the petition has become rendered infructuous. 2.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Prashant Kumar IVIishra Judge Nirala