← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/476/2021allowed

Sagar Kumar Deshlahre @ Ballu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-01-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya2 pages

M.Cr.C. No.476 of 2021 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 476 of 2021

1. Sagar Kumar Deshlahre @ Ballu S/o Bhagwan Das Deshlahre, Aged about 21 years

2. Aryan Kumar Dahre S/o Shri Man Singh Dahre, Aged about 19 years Both R/o Village Dumar Post Godhi, P.S. Nandini Nagar, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) ---- Applicants

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh, Through - SHO - Nandini Nagar, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ---- State/Non-Applicant For Applicant :

Shri Dheerendra Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya, J Order on Board 25.01.2021

1. Heard.

2. The application is admitted for hearing.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.

4. The applicants have preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. as they are in jail since 02.01.2021 in connection with Crime No. 05/2021 registered in Police Station- Nandini Nagar, District Durg (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of the CG Excise Act.

5. Allegation against the applicants is that they were found in illegal possession of 51.840 bulk liters of country made liquor.

6. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this crime, they are languishing in jail since 02.01.2021 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time. Therefore, the applicants be released on bail.

7. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail

M.Cr.C. No.476 of 2021 application.

8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the quantity of illicit liquor, the detention period of the applicants, that there is no apprehension of the applicants tampering with the evidence or absconding and they have no criminal antecedents as admitted by both the counsel, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.

9. It is directed that in the event of each of the applicants executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, they shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- i.

they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court. ii. they shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and iii. they shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to them by the said Court till disposal of the trial. iv. they shall not involve themselves in any offence of similar nature in future or else this order granting bail to the applicants shall automatically stand cancelled without further reference to the Bench.

Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge vatti