Waman Rao Wankhede v. C.G. State Electricity Board And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6065 of 2008 Waman Rao Wankhede S/o Sunhar Rao Wankhede aged about 51 years occupation Government Service Post Executive Engineer (T&D) Office of the Chief Executive Engineer (Rajnandgaon Circle) Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh Permanant R/o Balod Tahsil Balod District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board through Secretary Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2.

Joint Secretary Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board Raipur District Raipur Chhsttisgarh 3.

Bhim Singh Nagotiya Occupation Government Service Post Superintending Enginner (T&D) Posted at Office of S.E. (STRE) Circle Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4.

Sharad Kumar Shrivastava Occupation Government Service Post Superintending Engineer (T&D) Posted at Office of Joint Secretary (P)-II Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5.

Balram Soni Occupation Government Service Post Superintending Engineer (T&D) Posted at Office of S.E. (O/o C.R. (TRANS.) Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 6.

Smt. Pushpa Pandey Occupation Government Service Post Superintending Engineer (T&D) Posted at Office of S.E. O/o C.E. (STRE.) Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 7.

R.K. Awasthi Occupation Government Service Post Superintending Engineer (T&D) Posted at Office of S.E. City Circle Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

None.

For Respondents No.1 & 2 :

Shri B.D. Guru, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 22/02/2016 1.

The grievance of the Petitioner is with regard to denial of promotion even while his juniors were promoted to the post of Superintending Engineer (T&D). 2.

The counter affidavit was served on 23.2.2009. Paragraph-4 specifically states that the Petitioner was penalized and punished in a disciplinary proceeding withholding two increments with cumulative effect and for that reason

his case could not be considered when his juniors were promoted as the punishment was then in operation. There is no rejoinder to the counter affidavit. 3.

Presumably, the Petitioner has lost interest in the matter. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- (Navin Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE Subbu