← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/222/2007withdrawn

Dushyant v. Sirgius Minj

2016-01-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Contempt Petition No. 222 of 2007

1. Dushyant S/o Shri Chhannulal Harmukh, Aged About 43 Years Backward Class Clerical Work Date Of Appointment 10/04/1984, Daily-Wagers In Divisional Forest Office Durg Forest Division (General) Near Five Building, Durg, Chhattisgarh

2. Shyam Agnihotri S/o Shri Devidas Agnihotri, Aged About 51 Years Clerical Work Date Of Appointment 01/11/1984, Daily-Wagers In Divisional Forest Office Durg Forest Division (General) Near Five Building, Durg, Chhattisgarh

3. Sanat Sharma S/o Late Shri Shiv Kumar Sharma, Aged About 42 Years Clerical Work Date Of Appointment 09/01/1987, Daily-Wagers In Divisional Forest Office Durg Forest Division (General) Near Five Building, Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Arun Sharma S/o Shri B.M.Sharma, Aged About 47 Years Clerical Work Date Of Appointment 12/03/1988, Daily-Wagers In Divisional Forest Office Durg Forest Division (General) Near Five Building, Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Sirgius Minj Principal Secretary Forest Department Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. R.K. Sharma, Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest, Forest Department Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Jail Road Aranya Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Pratap Singh, Chief Conservator Of Forest, Forest Department Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Jail Road Aranya Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. M.T. Nandi, Conservator Of Forest Durg Circle Panch Building Durg, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Conservator Of Forest, Forest Department Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Jail Road Aranya Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners :

Shri V.G. Tamaskar, Advocate For respondent/ State :

Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, AAG

ORDER

Per P. Diwaker, J 1 3/01/2016 1.

Shri Tamaskar submits that he has filed the affidavit of the authorized

petitioner to withdraw this petition and accordingly he is withdrawing the Contempt Petition.

2.

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to this contention. 3.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/ Sd/ (Pritinker Diwaker) (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge Judge s/