Chandra Prakash Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgrh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 251 of 201
1. Chandra Prakash Gupta S/o Late Shri Krishna Bihari Gupta, Aged About 44 Years, Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Mowa, Block Dharsiwa, Raipur District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Smt. Narayani Nayak W/o Shri Dharmendra Nayak, Aged About 33 Years, Working As Lecturer (Nagriya Nikay) And Posted At J.R. Dani Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Block Dharsiwa, Raipur District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Smt. Manish Deshpandey W/o Shri Malay Deshpandey, Aged About 47 Years, Working As Lecturer (Nagriya Nikay) And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Mowa, Block Dharsiwa, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Smt. Hemlata Garg W/o Shri Siddharth Garg, Aged About 38 Years (Before Marriage Hemlata Bhoi), Working As Lecturer (Nagriya Nikay) And Posted At R. J. Naidu Government Higher Secondary School Ravigram, Raipur, Block Dharsiwa Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
5. Smt. Pinki Sahu W/o Dhirendra Kumar Sahu, Aged About 37 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Middle School Gudiyari (B), Block Dharsiwa, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
6. Smt. Sonal Shrivastava W/o Shri Anup Shrivastava, Aged About 40 Years, Working As Lecturer (Nagriya Nikay) And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Mowa, Block Dharsiwa, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. District Education Officer Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :
Shri Sameer Behar, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 15/01/2019 The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is the non granting of revised pay scale on their completing 8 years of service. 2.
The petitioners herein were initially appointed in the Panchayat Department and subsequently have been again taken in the Urban Administration Department. However, the Department is not accepting the total length of service rendered by the petitioners both under the Panchayat Department as well as under the Urban Administration Department for the purpose of granting of revised pay scale .
3.
Counsel for the parties fairly submit that the issue raised in the present writ petition stands squarely covered by a bunch of writ petitions decided by this Court on 27.10.2018, the leading case being WPS No. 6147 of 2018 (Shabnum Khatun Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others). 4.
Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition also deserves to be and is accordingly disposed of in similar terms as in the case of Shabnum Khatun (supra). The petitioners would be entitled for the benefit as prayed for subject to verification of the case by the
Department so far as the length of service and other eligibility criteria is concerned.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Khatai