Aradhana Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. 76 of 2018 • Aradhana Yadav, wife of Shri Santosh Yadav, aged about 34 years, Resident of Ware House Road, Near Uday Children Hospital Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner/Complainant

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent/State

2. Sandeep Khande, S/o Ram Singh Khande, aged about 29 years, resident of LIG 207, Deendayal Colony, Mangla, P.S. Civil Line, Tahsil and District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents/Accused For Petitioner :

Shri Wasim Miyan, Advocate For Respondent No. 1/State :

Shri Sameer Uraon, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.2/Complainant :

Shri Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya, J Order on Board 12.02.2021

1. The petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 439 (2) of the Cr.P.C. seeking cancellation of regular bail granted to respondent No.2 in connection with Crime No. 310/2017 registered in Police Station Civil Lines, District Bilaspur for offence punishable under Sections 294, 354, 354-C & 354-D of IPC vide order dated 30.08.2017 passed by co-ordinate bench of this Court in M.Cr.C. No. 5164 of 2017.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial has already been completed and the trial Court has pronounced the judgment, therefore, he wants to withdraw this petition as having become infructuous.

3. In view of the above submission, the present Cr.M.P. is disposed of as having become infructuous.

Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge vatti