← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/597/2013dismissed

Nandani Sahu v. Ranjit Sahu And ANR.

2019-08-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya2 pages

CRMP No. 597 of 2013 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 597 of 2013 • Nandani Sahu S/o Narsingh Sahu Aged About 16 Years Through - Its Natural Guardian Father Narsingh Sahu S./o Balram Sahu R/o Saraibhaddar , Chowki Jutmil , P.S. City Kotwali Civil And Rev. Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Ranjit Sahu S/o Gopal Sahu Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Saraibhadar , Chowki Jutmil , P.S. Kotwali,Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - P.S. City Kotwali, Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. KK Singh, Government Advocate DB:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Chourdiya Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

6/8/2019

1. Heard.

2. The trial Court has acquitted the accused of the charges under Sections 363, 366 and 376(1) of IPC.

3. Father of the prosecutrix lodged the FIR stating that her daughter has eloped with some person. In the case diary

CRMP No. 597 of 2013 statement of the prosecutirx, she has informed the Police that she was in an affair with the accused for about 3-4 years. In her Court statement, she admits that in the night, on the date of the incident, she and her mother left the room and then, she went to the Railway Station to board the train for proceeding to Kharsia and thereafter, she went to Delhi with the accused. They had stayed together for 6-7 months while earning livelihood in Delhi. She admits that she did not complain to any person either during her train journey or during her stay at Delhi even though she used to meet the Policemen at the workplace.

4. Even though the prosecutrix was less than 18 years of age on the date of the incident, her conduct and the delay in lodging the FIR have rightly been found sufÏcient by the trial Court to acquit the accused.

5. No case for grant of leave to appeal is made out.

6. The CRMP is dismissed.

Sd/- Sd/- ( Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Judge Shyna